|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Daryl
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 1168 Location: Everett, Washington
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ghoster
Joined: 14 Nov 2003 Posts: 152 Location: Scottsdale
|
Posted: 11/9/2004, 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
The only thing I have noticed is that they seem to be overrated in the temperature department. Usually about ten degrees, but other than that they seem to be fine, if you compensate for the over rating. Hope this helps. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Davis2001R6
Joined: 12 Dec 2003 Posts: 5591 Location: Italy
|
Posted: 11/9/2004, 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I think they are a pretty decent bag for the money. I have a 25 degree bag but I agree they overrate by about 10 degrees and I like to sleep cold too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cactuscat
Joined: 04 Jan 2003 Posts: 459 Location: Phoenix
|
Posted: 11/9/2004, 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Ditto - I have a SlumberJack bag which is just fine; it's a 35degree bag, and I've used it very close to that temp. 10 degree overatting is pretty standard - just make sure you have good padding/insulation underneath. My SJ bag was cheap, and it's very favorable in size/weight to other 35degree backpacking bags that cost much more. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daryl
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 1168 Location: Everett, Washington
|
Posted: 11/9/2004, 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Thanks! I'll probably get the 20 degree bag then. I don't like being cold. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shihiyea
Joined: 20 Oct 2003 Posts: 1135
|
Posted: 11/9/2004, 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
One of my bags is a slumberjack, it's a bit big (zero bag) for backpacking, but I've done it. I've always been very comfortable in it. I've also put it through the washing machine multiple times and it's holding up just fine. Mary |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fairweather8588
Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 716
|
Posted: 11/9/2004, 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I sport a 25 degree slumberjack bag, but have had mixed experiences with it. I was warmer when it was 30* out then I was when it was 40* out. go figure. But for $25 I ain't complainin _________________ But let the mind beware, that though the flesh be bugged, the circumstances of existence are pretty glorious
Kerouac |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lizard
Joined: 11 Jan 2003 Posts: 200 Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: 11/9/2004, 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Well, my opinion's going to differ from most of the posts in this thread. My first bag was a Slumberjack, and I liked it while I had it. But after trying out different bags over the years, I'll never go back. Slumberjack is really the bottom of the barrel.
There's a reason Slumberjack bags tend to be much cheaper than others. Slumberjack bags are made with substandard materials. They still use Quallofil as a fill They don't stand up to abuse as well as better bags, and they tend to be heavier and colder than equivalents. They are cheaper, but they will wear out and need replacing faster than a better-quality bag.
If you want to save money, try looking at the house brands offered by EMS, Campmor, and REI. They strive to make these bags of equal quality to the ones made by bigger companies like Sierra Designs and Marmot.
Some good inexpensive bags:
-EMS Boreal
20*, Polarguard 3D insulation, $99, 3 lb 3 oz
-EMS Mountain Light
20*, 725 fp down, $199, 2 lbs
-REI Shasta
15*, Polarguard Delta insulation, $149, 3 lbs 4 oz
Campmor Goosedown Mummy
20*, 550 fp down, $109, 2 lbs 4 oz _________________ "Men wanted for hazardous journey. Small wages, bitter cold, long months of complete darkness, constant danger, safe return doubtful. Honor and recognition in case of success.”- Sir Ernest Shackleton, newspaper classified. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MikeInFHAZ
Joined: 15 Feb 2004 Posts: 1401 Location: location location
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|