|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sacred_datura
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 138 Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
|
Posted: 10/3/2007, 9:04 pm Post subject: technical vs. non-technical |
|
|
|
|
What's the difference? Does non-technical indicate climbs that don't require ropes, harness, bells, and whistles?
Can ya tell I'm not a rock climber? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pfredricks
Joined: 10 Apr 2003 Posts: 347 Location: Peoria, AZ
|
Posted: 10/3/2007, 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
that's pretty much the difference
...although everyone's opinion about what is technical or not is somewhat subjective _________________ "I am just going outside and may be some time."- Explorer Oates' last words before crawling out of his tent in -40 C temps. Sacrificed himself so as not to hold back his 1912 South Pole expedition teamates. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
azbackpackr Hi Tech Wizardess
Joined: 31 Dec 2005 Posts: 3639 Location: Needles CA
|
Posted: 10/4/2007, 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
We had this issue come up in the Southern Arizona Hiking Club a few years ago. (They finally had to ban club-sponsored roped climbs due to a couple of incidents. They carry insurance, and it was going to be prohibitively expensive to insure for roped climbs.)
To a rock climber, technical means use of a lot of hardware, if I'm not mistaken. Chocks, pitons, mechanical ascenders, etc. To a rock climber a simple rappel, or a simple rope-assisted climb with one anchor and a belay is NOT considered technical.
But to the hikers in SAHC, any use of a rope was considered "technical." This became confusing when there were actual experienced rock climbers in the middle of the discussion, because in rock climbing the terminology is much more specific. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Matt Hoffman
Joined: 18 Feb 2004 Posts: 701 Location: Grantham, NH
|
Posted: 10/4/2007, 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
azbackpackr wrote: |
To a rock climber a simple rappel, or a simple rope-assisted climb with one anchor and a belay is NOT considered technical.
But to the hikers in SAHC, any use of a rope was considered "technical." This became confusing when there were actual experienced rock climbers in the middle of the discussion, because in rock climbing the terminology is much more specific. |
The climbers in Tucson must have been trying to be difficult when it came to the use of the term "technical".
Most climbers consider any climb where a rope is used to be technical. It really is as simple as that. _________________ "Your day-glo ballet days are over." Ancient chinese proverb.
http://web.mac.com/climbingsponge/Matt_Hoffman_Images/Welcome.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Al_HikesAZ
Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Posts: 263 Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
Posted: 10/4/2007, 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I basically agree with Matt. My understanding is that anytime you "set protection" it is technical. I imagine you could use a rope without "setting protection" but that sort of defeats the purpose of using the rope. Why use the rope if it's not secure? I want protection not psychological comfort. _________________ Anyone can make a hike harder. The skill comes in making it easier. Dosatéhigo nasádo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
azbackpackr Hi Tech Wizardess
Joined: 31 Dec 2005 Posts: 3639 Location: Needles CA
|
Posted: 10/4/2007, 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Matt Hoffman wrote: |
The climbers in Tucson must have been trying to be difficult when it came to the use of the term "technical". |
Cute! Hadn't thought of that!
I'll tell you, I'm glad the club banned the use of ropes, though. I witnessed some pretty scary stuff where the people had no business doing what they were doing. Little old ladies who wanted all the peaks on the club's list. (Like birders with their bird list--peakbaggers with their peak list. You know the type.) Back then these club list peaks included Babo, Cathedral, Thimble, etc. And there was this guy leading the roped hikes who was basically a putz. He took a lady off belay without telling her he had done so, and she fell and got hurt. Luckily not terribly hurt, but she had to go to the hospital. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
azhiker96
Joined: 05 Jan 2003 Posts: 1419
|
Posted: 10/4/2007, 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I've heard pretty much what Matt said but wonder if technical would be better defined as anything that is rated 5.0 or above. After all, there are people who free climb stuff that would curl most people's toes to do in a harness. That means a climb might be technical depending on who is climbing. _________________ It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. -- Carl Sagan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
threedogz
Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 668 Location: Chandler
|
Posted: 10/4/2007, 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I thought technical hiking/climbing/biking meant bringing a laptop with... _________________ You can never eat too much candy... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
azbackpackr Hi Tech Wizardess
Joined: 31 Dec 2005 Posts: 3639 Location: Needles CA
|
Posted: 10/5/2007, 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hikngrl Canyoneering is my 'Happy Place'
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 5578 Location: Peoria, AZ
|
Posted: 10/5/2007, 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
threedogz wrote: |
I thought technical hiking/climbing/biking meant bringing a laptop with... |
_________________ ~~~Diane~~~
I want to shine! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Back to top
|
|