|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
evenstar
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Posts: 5548 Location: SCW by way of CA
|
Posted: 8/22/2004, 9:48 pm Post subject: WFW II T-Shirts now available!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Kurthzone has done it again! Great new graphics for our WFW II Swim team Shirts!!!!
[center:eadc6e7876]
[/center:eadc6e7876]
They're available at the ArizonaHikers.com Gear Store:
http://arizonahikers.com/forum/azhshop.php
Swimmers....Get yours now!!!! _________________ John Richardson and Richie Rich, El Perro de Playero
http://members.tripod.com/~evenstar/index.html
http://www.arizonahikers.com
When the Man waked up he said, "What is Wild Dog doing here?" And the Woman said, "His name is not Wild Dog anymore, but the First Friend, because he will be our friend for always and always and always. Take him with you when you go hunting."
--Rudyard Kipling, from Just So Stories, 1902 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kurthzone Thread Killer
Joined: 31 Dec 2002 Posts: 1097 Location: Peoria, Arizona
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
There will be more shirts, just thought I'd submit them as I finished them. I'm still waiting on a few pics. I intend to do another swim team and several support and a generic or two.
Hooli why is one preview smaller than the other? Both of these images were the same resolution. Did you make the two previews and did you size them differently?
What is kurthzone extreme? _________________ ;o)> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evenstar
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Posts: 5548 Location: SCW by way of CA
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
kurthzone wrote: |
What is kurthzone extreme? |
Didn't you at one time label your site "Kurthzone Extreme?
kurthzone wrote: |
Hooli why is one preview smaller than the other? Both of these images were the same resolution. Did you make the two previews and did you size them differently?
|
Yeah, I made the two previews but have no idea why they're different sizes; had trouble uploading them from my hard drive to the Gallery; Mike suggested they were too big, so I resized them, but did both the same.
Don't make me think this morning.....I'm exhausted from spending three days getting the new motorhome ready, and can't _________________ John Richardson and Richie Rich, El Perro de Playero
http://members.tripod.com/~evenstar/index.html
http://www.arizonahikers.com
When the Man waked up he said, "What is Wild Dog doing here?" And the Woman said, "His name is not Wild Dog anymore, but the First Friend, because he will be our friend for always and always and always. Take him with you when you go hunting."
--Rudyard Kipling, from Just So Stories, 1902 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kurthzone Thread Killer
Joined: 31 Dec 2002 Posts: 1097 Location: Peoria, Arizona
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 1:07 pm Post subject: resolution |
|
|
|
|
evenstar wrote: |
kurthzone wrote: |
What is kurthzone extreme? |
Didn't you at one time label your site "Kurthzone Extreme?
kurthzone wrote: |
Hooli why is one preview smaller than the other? Both of these images were the same resolution. Did you make the two previews and did you size them differently?
|
Yeah, I made the two previews but have no idea why they're different sizes; had trouble uploading them from my hard drive to the Gallery; Mike suggested they were too big, so I resized them, but did both the same.
Don't make me think this morning.....I'm exhausted from spending three days getting the new motorhome ready, and can't |
My isp is extremezone.com
So many folks do not understand resolution. Often times dpi is confused with ppi. The files I sent you were 216 ppi (pixels per inch) @ 8 X 10 inches. when they are printed they can be output at 3000 dpi (dots per inch), 2400 dpi 1200 dpi, etc., etc., etc. Dots per inch define a spot size which in turn defines the pixel area that makes up the image. Add lpi into this mix and you have real confusion. Lines per inch define the number of halftone dots that print the color seperated image. Newpapers use 85 to 110 line halftone screens and fine magazines use 200 to 300 line screens. Anyway the resolution that Cafepress calls for is 150 t0 300. Anything less than that is going to show pixelization. Typical web graphics are only 72 ppi at same size. Some are 96 ppi, but both of those resolutions are two small for quality T-shirt printing. If you made your reductions anything less than 150 ppi @ 8 X 10 inches, then the chances are that the T-shirt will show some pixelization. Resolution is relative, so if a web graphic is 24 X 36 inches @ 72 ppi, it will print fine at 8 X 10 (sort of, at least for T-shirts). This is the reason I'm able to use some of the digital images that are in the Gallery. They are huge. So when you use them in a smaller area without resampling the reolution becomes greater than 72. Is any of this making sense? There is a point of diminishing return, that is the resolution is so great that the normal human eye can no longer discern the detail differences. _________________ ;o)> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evenstar
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Posts: 5548 Location: SCW by way of CA
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 3:40 pm Post subject: Re: resolution |
|
|
|
|
kurthzone wrote: |
So many folks do not understand resolution. Often times dpi is confused with ppi. The files I sent you were 216 ppi (pixels per inch) @ 8 X 10 inches. when they are printed they can be output at 3000 dpi (dots per inch), 2400 dpi 1200 dpi, etc., etc., etc. Dots per inch define a spot size which in turn defines the pixel area that makes up the image. Add lpi into this mix and you have real confusion. Lines per inch define the number of halftone dots that print the color seperated image. Newpapers use 85 to 110 line halftone screens and fine magazines use 200 to 300 line screens. Anyway the resolution that Cafepress calls for is 150 t0 300. Anything less than that is going to show pixelization. Typical web graphics are only 72 ppi at same size. Some are 96 ppi, but both of those resolutions are two small for quality T-shirt printing. If you made your reductions anything less than 150 ppi @ 8 X 10 inches, then the chances are that the T-shirt will show some pixelization. Resolution is relative, so if a web graphic is 24 X 36 inches @ 72 ppi, it will print fine at 8 X 10 (sort of, at least for T-shirts). This is the reason I'm able to use some of the digital images that are in the Gallery. They are huge. So when you use them in a smaller area without resampling the reolution becomes greater than 72. Is any of this making sense? There is a point of diminishing return, that is the resolution is so great that the normal human eye can no longer discern the detail differences. |
GEEK! _________________ John Richardson and Richie Rich, El Perro de Playero
http://members.tripod.com/~evenstar/index.html
http://www.arizonahikers.com
When the Man waked up he said, "What is Wild Dog doing here?" And the Woman said, "His name is not Wild Dog anymore, but the First Friend, because he will be our friend for always and always and always. Take him with you when you go hunting."
--Rudyard Kipling, from Just So Stories, 1902 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paintninaz
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 3515
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 3:57 pm Post subject: Re: resolution |
|
|
|
|
evenstar wrote: |
kurthzone wrote: |
So many folks do not understand resolution. Often times dpi is confused with ppi. The files I sent you were 216 ppi (pixels per inch) @ 8 X 10 inches. when they are printed they can be output at 3000 dpi (dots per inch), 2400 dpi 1200 dpi, etc., etc., etc. Dots per inch define a spot size which in turn defines the pixel area that makes up the image. Add lpi into this mix and you have real confusion. Lines per inch define the number of halftone dots that print the color seperated image. Newpapers use 85 to 110 line halftone screens and fine magazines use 200 to 300 line screens. Anyway the resolution that Cafepress calls for is 150 t0 300. Anything less than that is going to show pixelization. Typical web graphics are only 72 ppi at same size. Some are 96 ppi, but both of those resolutions are two small for quality T-shirt printing. If you made your reductions anything less than 150 ppi @ 8 X 10 inches, then the chances are that the T-shirt will show some pixelization. Resolution is relative, so if a web graphic is 24 X 36 inches @ 72 ppi, it will print fine at 8 X 10 (sort of, at least for T-shirts). This is the reason I'm able to use some of the digital images that are in the Gallery. They are huge. So when you use them in a smaller area without resampling the reolution becomes greater than 72. Is any of this making sense? There is a point of diminishing return, that is the resolution is so great that the normal human eye can no longer discern the detail differences. |
GEEK! |
GEEK! = "I STILL don't know what you're talking about Stan!" _________________ ~Tracy
“Friends make the bad times good — and the good times unforgettable.” |
|
Back to top |
|
|
roger
Joined: 13 Aug 2003 Posts: 262 Location: phoenix
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
Is any of this making sense?
|
NO
roger _________________ - you are what you do - |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kurthzone Thread Killer
Joined: 31 Dec 2002 Posts: 1097 Location: Peoria, Arizona
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Just get a pumpkin shirt, and hopefully Hooli hasn't pumpkin them up! _________________ ;o)> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evenstar
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Posts: 5548 Location: SCW by way of CA
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Think maybe he's saying "Size Matters!" _________________ John Richardson and Richie Rich, El Perro de Playero
http://members.tripod.com/~evenstar/index.html
http://www.arizonahikers.com
When the Man waked up he said, "What is Wild Dog doing here?" And the Woman said, "His name is not Wild Dog anymore, but the First Friend, because he will be our friend for always and always and always. Take him with you when you go hunting."
--Rudyard Kipling, from Just So Stories, 1902 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kurthzone Thread Killer
Joined: 31 Dec 2002 Posts: 1097 Location: Peoria, Arizona
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
evenstar wrote: |
Think maybe he's saying "Size Matters!" |
Among other things! _________________ ;o)> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evenstar
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Posts: 5548 Location: SCW by way of CA
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
He's kinda grumpy, but at least Ol' Stan's back postin' again
Maybe 'cause I'm holdin' his coffee cup hostage and he ain't had any coffee since WFW II _________________ John Richardson and Richie Rich, El Perro de Playero
http://members.tripod.com/~evenstar/index.html
http://www.arizonahikers.com
When the Man waked up he said, "What is Wild Dog doing here?" And the Woman said, "His name is not Wild Dog anymore, but the First Friend, because he will be our friend for always and always and always. Take him with you when you go hunting."
--Rudyard Kipling, from Just So Stories, 1902 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Trishness The Snake Charmer
Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 2530 Location: Apache Jct, AZ
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Stan,
How about getting some tank tops with logos on them? That'd be great!
Thanks
_________________ ~~~Trish~~~
"Eastward the dawn rose, ridge behind ridge into the morning, and vanished out of eyesight into guess; it was no more than a glimmer blending with the hem of the sky, but it spoke to them, out of the memory and old tales, of the high and distant mountains." � J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of The Rings. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evenstar
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Posts: 5548 Location: SCW by way of CA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Trishness The Snake Charmer
Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 2530 Location: Apache Jct, AZ
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
WOW,
Look how quickly my wish was granted!!!! Thanks Hooli!
_________________ ~~~Trish~~~
"Eastward the dawn rose, ridge behind ridge into the morning, and vanished out of eyesight into guess; it was no more than a glimmer blending with the hem of the sky, but it spoke to them, out of the memory and old tales, of the high and distant mountains." � J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of The Rings. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ck1
Joined: 04 Jan 2003 Posts: 1331 Location: Mesa
|
Posted: 8/23/2004, 7:28 pm Post subject: Re: resolution |
|
|
|
|
kurthzone wrote: |
So many folks do not understand resolution. Often times dpi is confused with ppi. The files I sent you were 216 ppi (pixels per inch) @ 8 X 10 inches. when they are printed they can be output at 3000 dpi (dots per inch), 2400 dpi 1200 dpi, etc., etc., etc. Dots per inch define a spot size which in turn defines the pixel area that makes up the image. Add lpi into this mix and you have real confusion. Lines per inch define the number of halftone dots that print the color seperated image. Newpapers use 85 to 110 line halftone screens and fine magazines use 200 to 300 line screens. Anyway the resolution that Cafepress calls for is 150 t0 300. Anything less than that is going to show pixelization. Typical web graphics are only 72 ppi at same size. Some are 96 ppi, but both of those resolutions are two small for quality T-shirt printing. If you made your reductions anything less than 150 ppi @ 8 X 10 inches, then the chances are that the T-shirt will show some pixelization. Resolution is relative, so if a web graphic is 24 X 36 inches @ 72 ppi, it will print fine at 8 X 10 (sort of, at least for T-shirts). This is the reason I'm able to use some of the digital images that are in the Gallery. They are huge. So when you use them in a smaller area without resampling the reolution becomes greater than 72. Is any of this making sense? There is a point of diminishing return, that is the resolution is so great that the normal human eye can no longer discern the detail differences. |
Umm...thanks Cliff.
Did anybody actually read the whole paragraph? I got about 2 sentences in and all I heard was the teacher on Peanuts "wa wa wa blah blah blaH". _________________ -Colin
"The Journey is the Destination" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|